How does an emphasis on being a ‘student’ rather than a ‘learner’ impact children’s motivation for school tasks?
A series of question that started with a similar premise followed this initial query. For me what resonated was the comparison or implied contrast between student and learner. In and even out of schools, these terms are viewed as the same. However, I think there a stark differences between these words. As suggested in the post, a student is someone who receives knowledge. Students either attend school or do well because it is part of a larger cultural norm. Additionally, students are devoid of assuming ownership in the classroom and in schools.
In contrast, I think we want our kids to be learners. To be conservative, there are a fair number of schools that state in a mission statement a desire to foster life-long learning. I think one would be challenged to find a mission statement or set of objectives in which kids are encouraged to be life-long students. Learners are active, inquisitive and assume ownership. Learners have passions and interests that are vigorously pursued. Learning further implies a constant process. Learning leads to additional questions and continued acts of discovery.
I wonder about the potential impact if we supported learners. Would the mindset begin to change if we became a building of learners and not an academic environment that delineates roles and expectations.
A series of question that started with a similar premise followed this initial query. For me what resonated was the comparison or implied contrast between student and learner. In and even out of schools, these terms are viewed as the same. However, I think there a stark differences between these words. As suggested in the post, a student is someone who receives knowledge. Students either attend school or do well because it is part of a larger cultural norm. Additionally, students are devoid of assuming ownership in the classroom and in schools.
In contrast, I think we want our kids to be learners. To be conservative, there are a fair number of schools that state in a mission statement a desire to foster life-long learning. I think one would be challenged to find a mission statement or set of objectives in which kids are encouraged to be life-long students. Learners are active, inquisitive and assume ownership. Learners have passions and interests that are vigorously pursued. Learning further implies a constant process. Learning leads to additional questions and continued acts of discovery.
I wonder about the potential impact if we supported learners. Would the mindset begin to change if we became a building of learners and not an academic environment that delineates roles and expectations.
I enjoyed your post, Scott, thank you for sharing. Mutual respect [and some humility] might be key factors in changing perspectives towards learners versus students.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment- I agree that a sense of humility needs to be present where adults also see themselves as learners.
ReplyDeleteThanks for extending the conversation over here. We're supposed to be about learning in schools, right? 99% of schools have a mission statement that says "blah blah blah life long learning blah blah blah." And yet we do a terrible job of modeling this as educators. How many educators intentionally and explicitly model the learning process for students? How many stand up and say "This is what I'm learning right now. I'm not any good at the moment but this is the process I'm following and what my plan is for achieving success."? Nearly zero. There are many reasons, but one of the biggest ones is ego. We feel like we have to be the 'experts' instead of co-learners. What would our kids learn from us if, as parents and educators, we did a better job of showing that we too are learners?
ReplyDelete